Van Canna wrote:
I am sure we are on the same page on this one…but…guys like Joe Pomfret studied BJJ…he did not 'find' the grappling in Uechi by just practicing Uechi and going the so called 'deeper' BS I hear quite often. As I have said countless times…developing bad habits…and people will if trying to find the grapple in Uechi without guidance by someone who knows grappling _ will bury them on the street.
Certainly in many ways we are on the same page. I got my grappling sense from studying Goju and aikido from someone who began his martial journey in judo. He was a genius at creating continuous-movement Goju bunkai that contained at least one grappling movement.
My curse in Uechi was my blessing. I was outside where established instructors were, so I had to build my Uechi with a curriculum constructed from training available to me. I saw the need to do stand-up AND grappling well before MMA became a cliché. My first karate instructor (Japanese) was himself a judo player.
This is my opinion - worth two cents and some change. (
Danger, danger!!!)
The lack of grappling in most Uechi dojos isn't the fault of the style; it's the fault of interpretation and execution on (most of) Okinawa. Don't blame the style, and don't blame the material Kanbun saw in China. I cannot believe that the brand of in-your-face fighting he saw in China (pre Okinawan sport karate) was lacking a ground game, or consisted only of hard contact striking. IMO the problem involved trying to package the lessons he learned. Other than through the kata, it's tough. His jiyu was just... different. And I'm sure lots of people got hurt. It happens...
I'm also of an academic and of a Chinese mindset in that I believe it is the responsibility of us "old timers" not to be Matrix-style clones, but rather to explore, interpret, and to contribute. And yes - that means exploring outside the dojo walls as many of our Okinawan elders did.
After shodan I endorse my students' excursions outside the confines of my teaching. And I expect them to bring their life lessons back home with them, and grow what I gave them.
Van Canna wrote:
The reason why Joey has developed a basic grappling drill for Uechi people…out of his BJJ training.
All good stuff. I've bought his videos. As Milton Berle used to say, "I know a good joke when I steal it."

Van Canna wrote:
If someone wants to be good at grappling he will need specific cross training which he can then 'relate' to Uechi.
Here's the thing. I teach ukemi in my Uechi dojo on day one. Do my students need to go outside my dojo to learn it? No.
Will they need to go outside my dojo to see why I planted the seeds within them? If they're smart they will.

A good teacher is like a good parent. You don't necessarily give a child everything they need in the world. You make it possible for them to earn it on their own. As I've seen many a time in New England Uechi Ryu... when you hand someone material on a silver platter, they don't appreciate what is there right in front of them. The lesson is learned more deeply when it comes from self-discovery in a process guided by a good teacher.
Van Canna wrote:
Yup…Gushi's Bunkai applications have an entirely different execution focus. Much more realistic.

His Uechi is to modern Okinawan Uechi as traditional Japanese jujutsu (as practiced by Rory Miller or Sal Jaber) is to BJJ. The former is combat oriented; the latter is geared to sport. One isn't necessarily superior to the other. Each has its niche.
But most of the principles are the same, which makes the teacher more important (IMO) than the specific art.
- Bill