Bunkai I - A look at the original explanation

Bill's forum was the first! All subjects are welcome. Participation by all encouraged.

Moderator: Bill Glasheen

Bunkai I - A look at the original explanation

Postby Victor Smith » Mon Sep 05, 2011 8:05 pm

I'm beginning a new series on my blog about 'bunkai', using Mabuni Kenwa's original examples from his 1934 ‘Goshin Karate Kempo’ using Seienchin Kata.

http://isshin-concentration.blogspot.co ... ation.html
Victor Smith
bushi no te isshinryu
Victor Smith
 
Posts: 203
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 2:17 am
Location: Derry, NH, USA

Re: Bunkai I - A look at the original explanation

Postby maxwell ainley » Sat Sep 10, 2011 11:26 am

Interesting stuff Victor ,I do look at your blog and find it informative .
max ainley
maxwell ainley
 
Posts: 1690
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2001 6:01 am
Location: england

Re: Bunkai I - A look at the original explanation

Postby Bill Glasheen » Sat Sep 10, 2011 3:54 pm

Victor Smith wrote:
One possible interpretation of Funakoshi Sensei’s comment was that the Dan should analyze their technique and then use that analysis in their training as in how to use the technique. This does not seem to indicate there was a defined use of kata but a more open ended study. I feel this harkens back to the days of personal instruction and direct guidance of the instructor for the student.

{snip}

If you observe the kata, the drawings and the video closely you’ll see that Mabuni shows more than just the kata. In the drawing shown he used a closed fist strike instead of the spear hand strike of the kata. He also clearly adds a kick not in the kata for one of the ‘bunkai’ responses too. In this it is clear that ‘bunkai’ meant more than just the actual kata technique, exactly as Shiroma Shimpan (another Itosu student) showed in Nakasone’s 1938 ‘Karate-Do Taikan”.

Very nicely stated.

We've had some martial pinheads (of doom) post here and on other Forums who like to box martial techniques into neat little boxes. (THAT'S NOT UECHI!!!! :shocked!: ) and get bent out of shape when more than one application is attributed to a sequence in martial choreography (a.k.a. kata). And yet here from Victor we see that karate started...

  • As one-on-one personal instruction, and not in large classes with instructors shouting Ichi! Ni! San!.
    ..
  • As an "open-ended" study, implying no fixed temporal and/or content boundaries.
    ..
  • As an iterative process (similar to CQI) where the student and teacher bounced back and forth between the practice of choreography and the analysis of said choreography.
    ..
  • As a non-literal exercise in human movement where practitioners are doing "more than just the actual kata technique." In other words the kata serve not as a literal study of karate dogma, but rather as a mnemonic device.

Good stuff! 8)

- Bill
User avatar
Bill Glasheen
 
Posts: 17308
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 1999 6:01 am
Location: Richmond, VA --- Louisville, KY

Re: Bunkai I - A look at the original explanation

Postby Victor Smith » Tue Sep 13, 2011 4:17 pm

Victor Smith
bushi no te isshinryu
Victor Smith
 
Posts: 203
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 2:17 am
Location: Derry, NH, USA


Return to Bill Glasheen's Dojo Roundtable

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests