Valkenar wrote:I guess I can agree that Anonymous might see some benefits from this, but can you cite anything to back up the stronger claim that movement is really about Anonymous. That seems like borderline conspiracy theoryism, and it's pretty far out of sync from everything I've read about it.
When you find an application that singles out a Twitter feed and prints it out going months back, let me know. Just going back to September 15th using Twitter.com took me two hours, and that was reading one feed and copying relevant tweets.
IOW, what I've been watching on Twitter and hacker news sites doesn't match what the media's reporting. Big surprise.
Here's some Twitter feeds to check into yourself, if you're feeling froggy:
At least I'm not claiming George Soros is behind it.