List-ka,
Haisai Van, Bill, Marcus,and all, sorry about being away from the forum as my Counter-Terrorism work has been unfortunately, a bit hectic.
Some very well thought out replies to Van's questions. Leo used the example of my old friend, Andre, who I have not seen in too many years, and his attitude towards others.
Personally, despite having ''senior'' grades in 2 Okinawan styles- Okinawan Goju Ryu and Kyudokan Shorin Ryu and have the hanko and signature on menjo tucked away in some closet somewhere wrapped in a tube. It is not that I am not proud of my accomplishments, but as a ''senior'' it is no longer my job to post my menjo on a wall of the dojo but it is my ''ON'' to make sure that my Yudansha are better than me. (Shu ha ri).
One does not have to have numerous awards, rankings, photos with masters, to prove ''their depth of knowledge'' and ''seniority'' of others in the region as this gentleman does in my neighborhood:
http://tinyurl.com/7a9e2jfOne who is not knowledgeable of martial arts and reads the article would think that this gentleman must have trained very hard throughout the years to accomplish the accolades that are listed in the paper.
http://youtu.be/Y0JtqnyoxDcOne of yudansha, was a temporary worker at the Post Office that he is a letter carrier while he was in college (94-98) and heard him speak about going to tournaments, etc. Then, and even the recent past when Jay ran into him, he was respectfully invited to his dojo to train/ or watch our yudasha class. He has yet visited and I believe that by visiting would shake him out of his own comfort area.
It was previously pointed out, and I agree, that seniority is earned on the dojo floor, the harder a teacher trains, and the example that you set while teaching and being able to make the performance of kihon techniques difficult and challenging no matter the rank, rather than the boorish 5 slow, 5 strong kihon practice that I have seen in many dojo; speaks loudly not only for one's teaching ability but it cements the teacher's level of seniority within the dojo and within an organization, or within a particular style-association not withstanding.
I recall a story about a ken jutsu teacher that I read about many years ago: I am paraphrasing " One admires the sharp katana, the beauty of the water marks on the blade, its heft-so perfect in your hands, the furniture (handle-scabbard,etc), the lavish tsuba that has been matched with the blade is pure perfection. Its cut is perfect and during its use in kata it feels as if it dances in your hands. But we fail terribly to remember the toil, the molding of the steal, the hammer strikes next to the hot fire, the spreading of the clay to make sure that the blade tempers probably and in turn causing the beautiful water marks on the blade later. The timing to drop the heated blade at the right time into the water to cool it. Then one must spend hours upon hours to polish and sharpen the blade before it is even considered 'finished and he signs his name to the blade' which will lie hidden under the handle of the blade unless the handle is removed for some purpose." Of the two- the practitioner or the sword maker- who has the "depth of knowledge''?
>>> Tsuba or hand guard on blade
