Bravo to Our Brave Fighters in London
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 3:45 pm
(sic)
Kudos, another undefended civilian target destroyed,
I has been that OSBL adopted much of his present MO based on his justifiable interpretation of the US "cut and run" fights of the United States, for example in Mogadishishu.
In other past engagements (Vietnam) but hanging in for nine years in a war that "no one wanted to win" would hardly be a basis for expecting an easy victory via an insurrectional route, so this postion may not be a wise one for OSBL.
I will go so as to say that the British reaction to this is likely to be "give it em back"--as anything else and as they reacted to the Luftwaffe's bombing of civilian targets, in WWII, which was, inteh end, a major tactical, strategic and propaganda mistake.
Comments?
Kudos, another undefended civilian target destroyed,
I has been that OSBL adopted much of his present MO based on his justifiable interpretation of the US "cut and run" fights of the United States, for example in Mogadishishu.
In other past engagements (Vietnam) but hanging in for nine years in a war that "no one wanted to win" would hardly be a basis for expecting an easy victory via an insurrectional route, so this postion may not be a wise one for OSBL.
I will go so as to say that the British reaction to this is likely to be "give it em back"--as anything else and as they reacted to the Luftwaffe's bombing of civilian targets, in WWII, which was, inteh end, a major tactical, strategic and propaganda mistake.
Comments?