Drug has 'stunning' effect

A place to share ideas, concerns, questions, and thoughts about women and the martial arts.

Moderator: Available

Post Reply
User avatar
Bill Glasheen
Posts: 17299
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 1999 6:01 am
Location: Richmond, VA --- Louisville, KY

Drug has 'stunning' effect

Post by Bill Glasheen »

Results like these, coming from genetic engineering, are one reason why health insurance inflation is still in double digits. But who's to argue with results? Can you put a price on quality years? Ultimately it does come down to money.

But let's celebrate the successes, and let society deal later with the choices.

- Bill
Posted 10/19/2005 5:04 PM

Drug has 'stunning' effect on early breast cancer

The Associated Press


A drug that targets only diseased cells has proved astonishingly effective against an aggressive form of early breast cancer — a long-sought breakthrough that has doctors talking about curing thousands of women each year in this country alone.

Herceptin, made by Genentech Inc., is already used for advanced cancer. But in three studies involving thousands of women with early-stage disease, it cut the risk of a relapse in half.

Several experts used words like "revolutionary," "stunning" and "jaw-dropping" to describe the findings.

"In 1991, I didn't know that we would cure breast cancer, and in 2005, I'm convinced we have," exulted Dr. Jo Anne Zujewski, head of breast cancer therapeutics at the government's National Cancer Institute.

Herceptin, known generically as trastuzumab, does not help everyone. For one thing, it is only for the estimated 20% of breast cancer cases in which tumors churn out too much of a protein known as HER2. In the recent studies, the drug was used along with standard treatments, including surgery and chemotherapy.

Still, Herceptin could be the biggest thing in cancer drugs since research a decade ago demonstrated the extraordinary effectiveness of tamoxifen, another medicine that transformed the treatment of the disease by homing in on cancer cells but sparing healthy ones.

Herceptin appears to have "changed one of the most worrisome kinds of cancers into one that may have a relatively good prognosis," said Dr. Ed Romond of the University of Kentucky.

He was one of the researchers who reported findings from three Herceptin studies Thursday in The New England Journal of Medicine. One was an international study sponsored by Herceptin's European marketer, Roche. The others were North American studies sponsored by the National Cancer Institute. The researchers followed a total of more than 6,500 women with early-stage breast cancer.

In the first study, 220 women taking standard therapy for a year either developed breast cancer again, showed other kinds of tumors, or died. Only 127 did when Herceptin was added.

The two other studies, partly funded by Genentech, reached similar findings in their combined results. At three years, patients on Herceptin showed a disease-free survival rate that was 12 percentage points higher than without it.

The government approved the drug in 1998 for advanced breast cancer that has already spread within the body. But early-stage cases are much more common.

Many doctors are already embracing the drug for such women, cancer experts say, because details of the three studies were first publicized last spring at a medical conference.

"The strength of the evidence is so overwhelming at this point that it would be almost impossible to withhold this drug from the appropriate group of patients," said Dr. Gabriel Hortobagyi, of the University of Texas, who is president-elect of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Genentech intends to apply to the U.S. government to add early-stage cancer use to Herceptin's label, spokeswoman Colleen Wilson said. But doctors are already free prescribe the drug for early breast cancer on their own authority.

About 200,000 woman are diagnosed with breast cancer each year in this country, and 40,000 die. About 30,000 American women will probably be taking Herceptin for breast cancer within a couple of years, curing perhaps 7,000 who would otherwise relapse, some doctors predicted.

However, doctors cautioned that some women get better without Herceptin, especially when there is little evidence that the cancer is spreading within the breast. Also, a small number taking the drug suffer heart failure.

A year of Herceptin could cost $48,000 even at wholesale prices.

Tamoxifen has the same kind of benefit as Herceptin — a 50% reduction in risk — but works against another large class of cancer cases known as estrogen-positive.

Debbie Saslow, director of the breast cancer section of the American Cancer Society, said she was impressed by the Herceptin findings but wants to watch such patients for years. "I think it's way too soon to talk about a cure," she said.

It is also unclear whether Herceptin should be taken with chemotherapy drugs, soon afterward, or even years later. Herceptin appears so potent, some researchers said, that patients might someday be able to skip chemotherapy, radiation and surgery, which destroy both healthy and diseased tissue.

American sales of Herceptin leaped by two-thirds, to $215 million, in the three months ending Oct. 1, compared with the year's first quarter, according to South San Francisco, Calif.-based Genentech.

- USA Today
Gene DeMambro
Posts: 1684
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 1998 6:01 am
Location: Weymouth, MA US of A

Post by Gene DeMambro »

Way freakin' cool........

Herceptin would cure 7,000 patients who would otherwise relapse. At a minumum cost of $48,000, exclusive of doctor's charges, pharmacy charges, hospital, etc. Worth it? I vote yes.
Remember the poor decision making with BMT for breast cancer? It just HAD to work , and insurance companies were forced to pay for and physiciancs were brow-beaten to provide it....even though it didn't work. What should we do if/when Herceptin is used in cancers other than breast cancers? $48,000 is a lot of money to spend on unproven treatment.

But, I too revel in the news and celebrate the success.

Cheers,
Gene
User avatar
Bill Glasheen
Posts: 17299
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 1999 6:01 am
Location: Richmond, VA --- Louisville, KY

Post by Bill Glasheen »

ECELLENT example, Gene. God, do I remember ABMT. In fact I help work on a software product that takes health insurance claims and buckets them into homogenous disease and treatment categories. We still have this damn ABMT bucket with no (zero, zilch, zippo, nada) claims in it any more.

Yea, it just HAD to work. And they could save a woman for only about $100K. And if insurance would only pay, the unit price would come down. Because it was a woman's issue and because a woman's breast is at least as "personal" as a guys penis, any insurance company that said "no" was made out to be a money-grubbing ogre.

Then they found out it didn't work. Lots of women unnecessarily fried senseless with radiation, only to die anyway of an even more horrible death.

Oops! :oops:

In the world of medicine, $20,000 per quality-adjusted year of life saved is considered a good deal. With this kind of CLINICAL EVIDENCE, it will get paid for. We all will have to ****** up the premium increases, but it will be worth it.

If we could stop a lot of the crap going on in medicine that DOESN'T work it could be paid for with the money saved.

One day...

- Bill
Gene DeMambro
Posts: 1684
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 1998 6:01 am
Location: Weymouth, MA US of A

Post by Gene DeMambro »

$20,000 per quality-adjusted year of life saved is considered a good deal.
Interesting number. I'll have to remember that one.

Wonder how many claims in the nesritide bucket, Bill.

One day indeed. The wheels of change grind slowly.....

Gene
Post Reply

Return to “Women and the Martial Arts”