Page 1 of 1

How credible is this information?

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 6:33 am
by AAAhmed46
http://www.shadowsofnamek.com/forum/sho ... post867104

Read the first post.

How credible is this?

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 6:44 am
by Stryke
If by credible you mean no one can understand any illogical election system in North America (and I include Canada) then I say yes it credible ....

I have a new system you guys should try 1 person 1 vote .... and the man with the most votes wins !!! :lol: :roll: :? 8O

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 9:12 am
by AAAhmed46
Yeah man, about canada.

I mean we vote on ridings. You vote for conservative candidate Jon Snow in your area, who is going agianst Jack Black who is an NDP. Jon Snow is a very good and honest man; and Jack Black isnt.

HOWEVER; Mr. Harper is a creepy man; and you elect Jon Snow, you get Harper into power federally, no matter how good Jon Snow is.

See the problem?

But you probably know that since you spent so much time here.

But i just wanted to underline the problem.

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:42 pm
by CANDANeh
Stryke wrote:If by credible you mean no one can understand any illogical election system in North America (and I include Canada) then I say yes it credible ....

I have a new system you guys should try 1 person 1 vote .... and the man with the most votes wins !!! :lol: :roll: :? 8O
The ballot should simply read

-Harper eh?
-Martin fella eh ?
-Layton (the grey haired guy ...eh) ?
-Don Cherry eh yaaaaaaa!
- Marihauna party (the stoned guy eh)?
- The Block...scary eh?

No cross checking cause that ain`t good hockey eh, you know who wants more gun control and one guy is creepy, another fellow well were really tired of that cr#p and ohhh man were scre#%d!!!!!

8O

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 5:32 pm
by James T
:lol: Funny post Leo!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McGillicuddy_Serious_Party

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McGillicuddy_Highland_Army


Mean while the Kiwi's appear to have it worked out. I hear there's still plenty of room on the rock

Kirk