Uechi-Ryu.com

Discussion Area
It is currently Sun Nov 23, 2014 1:10 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Reasonable?????????????
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 9:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 12:31 pm
Posts: 280
Location: Townsend, MA
On May 24, 2006 at approx. 10:00AM Beverly Police were called to a restaurant where the arriving officer observed a woman thrashing about on the floor. Paramedics were summoned and upon arrival asked if the woman was 'on' anything. The P.O. observed her purse nearby and opened it and discovered what turned out to be several marijuana cigarettes and 2 vials of what was later determined to be cocaine.

The woman was transported and treated and later charged. The motion Judge threw out the evidence as a a warrantless search - Commonwealth filed an interlocutory appeal and the Appeals Court reversed citing an emergency exception to the requirement of a warrant.

My guess is that we haven't heard the last of this yet, but what are your thoughts? To what level does an emergency need to rise in order for constitutionally protected rights to be given a back seat?

Here is the link to the decision:

http://www.masslawyersweekly.com/signup ... 106208.htm


John

_________________
It's what we do!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 3:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 9:52 pm
Posts: 1146
Location: Massachusetts
Since I've thought about this some more and nobody else has responded, I'll just edit my post instead of adding another one.

I now see what John was getting at.

I have to concede that the evidence supports the finding that an emergency existed in this case. That probable cause was not established is undisputed, and yet it would have been reasonable for the officer's suspicion to be aroused to some degree. The search was initiated under the emergency exception, ostensibly to help the victim/defendant but ultimately to prosecute her for precisely what the search was initiated to find. It's not exactly the sort of application of the emergency exception that leaves you feeling good about the subsequent prosecution.

It's not so much the severity of the emergency that concerns me, rather the broad applicability of the argument to search for anything that might significantly assist in the treatment of an unresponsive person in an emergency situation. It's always helpful for emergency medical personnel to be informed of what drugs (legal or illegal) a patient has taken. Suppose the search of the purse had been fruitless and the policeman had called in to have the victim's residence searched? Is anybody who needs urgent medical care who can't speak for themselves fair game for a police search for drugs?

_________________
Mike


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 1999 6:01 am
Posts: 3559
Location: Valhalla
Personally I don't look at drug addicts as criminals but as people with serious mental and physical health problems. Take away her license I agree, but I would rather see her in a drug treatment program than in prison. However catch the guys who sold her the drugs and lock them up, absolutely.

F.

_________________
Sans Peur Ne Obliviscaris
www.hinghamkarate.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group