Uechi-Ryu.com

Discussion Area
It is currently Thu Nov 27, 2014 8:48 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

Was it worth the life of a 7 year old child?
Poll ended at Wed Jun 16, 2010 3:32 pm
Yes, any means to get the homicide suspect 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Yes, it's ashame but collateral damage happens 14%  14%  [ 1 ]
No, but it wasn't the police's fault 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
No, police need to remember to protect innocent by-standers first 43%  43%  [ 3 ]
Never, better that 100 guilty people walk than 1 innocent person is harmed 43%  43%  [ 3 ]
Total votes : 7
Author Message
 Post subject: Was it really worth it?
PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2010 3:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 17, 2000 6:01 am
Posts: 2813
Location: Massachusetts
You'll have to go read the entire story, but there are a few things that caught my attention. They're listed after the link...

http://www.myfoxdetroit.com/dpp/news/7-year-old-shot-and-killed-by-dpd

Quote:
DETROIT - DETROIT (AP) -- Seven-year-old Aiyana Jones was asleep on the living room sofa in her family's apartment when Detroit police searching for a homicide suspect burst in and an officer's gun went off, fatally striking the girl in the neck, family members say.


1) "...an officer's gun went off..." WTF?!?! Forget what you think you know about firearms, guns don't just "go off"! And if it was holstered, then it would have struck the officer, not a 7 year old child. If it was not holstered, a confrontation was expected...

2) They were searching the house for a suspect in a homicide and they had a warrant. How does endangering an innocent 7 year old child become acceptable even under those circumstances?

3) There was "some level of physical contact" with a 46 year old woman in the house. If you raid a house at nearly 1AM, start the raid with a flash-bang grenade, and kick in the front door, don't you expect to encounter disoriented, confused people instinctively fighting back to protect their home and family?

4) The homicide suspect was caught in the house, but was it really worth the life of an innocent 7 year old? Whatever happened to "we believe the suspect is hiding at this residence, surround the residence, secure the safety of innocent people, WAIT for the suspect to come out OR knock on the door and execute the warrant to insure the safety of innocent people inside"?

5) What do YOU think?

_________________
==================================
My God-given Rights are NOT "void where prohibited by law!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 21, 2010 6:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 17, 2000 6:01 am
Posts: 2813
Location: Massachusetts
Well some folks voted in the poll. Interesting results actually. But no one wanted to make a comment on the story. Interesting again...

_________________
==================================
My God-given Rights are NOT "void where prohibited by law!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 22, 2010 3:07 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 11:06 am
Posts: 1750
Location: USA
Detroit schools are incompetent. Their mayor was jailed. The Detroit Police Dept killing an innocent girl? I'm shocked. Truly. :roll:

Should the DPD engage in raids of this kind to apprehend dangerous people? I think they should. Should training and performance reviews eliminate stupidity? I think they should. Do I ever expect the DPD to get their act together? Not really. Detroit is the armpit of Michigan. 'Nuff said.

I didn't like any of the poll answers.

_________________
Life begins & ends cold, naked & covered in crap.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 2:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 17, 2000 6:01 am
Posts: 2813
Location: Massachusetts
Jason Rees wrote:
I didn't like any of the poll answers.


So what would you have liked to see for a poll answer?

Would your position be along the lines of:

"Yes, but it wasn't the police's fault?"

Or something else?

I do realize that my own bias was in the poll answers and tried to say as much in the original post.

Do you believe that the only option to apprehend the suspect was the 12:30 AM forced entry raid? Was there some other way to do this that would have not put innocent children in harm's way?

_________________
==================================
My God-given Rights are NOT "void where prohibited by law!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 3:53 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 11:06 am
Posts: 1750
Location: USA
Of course there was another option: the dangerous felon should not have been staying there. Another possibility is mandating better training and accountability for police tactics.

_________________
Life begins & ends cold, naked & covered in crap.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 4:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 17, 2000 6:01 am
Posts: 2813
Location: Massachusetts
Jason Rees wrote:
Of course there was another option: the dangerous felon should not have been staying there.


I could agree with an innocent adult who decided to remain in the house rather than either leave or make the perp leave being viewed somehow as "collateral damage" in that case, but...

An innocent 7-year-old child, by any stretch of imagination does not have either the understanding of the situation or the ability to act.

Quote:
Another possibility is mandating better training and accountability for police tactics.


Why is it necessary to have a dynamic entry in a situation where children are present rather than waiting and picking up adults as they are safely outside away from the children?

_________________
==================================
My God-given Rights are NOT "void where prohibited by law!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 7:45 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 11:06 am
Posts: 1750
Location: USA
If you are seen, or they're tipped off, you end up with a hostage situation, which is even more dangerous for the innocents involved.

Pre-emptive entry should always be an option, IF the training regime is adequate.

_________________
Life begins & ends cold, naked & covered in crap.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 8:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 17, 2000 6:01 am
Posts: 2813
Location: Massachusetts
That answers why you believe dynamic entry is needed, but I'm not sure I agree that it is necessary at all. I can't agree with tossing flash-bangs into a home where children are and I don't believe that the occupants would take their own family hostage either. It seems that simply picking up adults as they head out to run errands or go to work, and waiting for children to be out of the house for school or with adults is much safer than a dynamic entry... for everyone involved. I just don't see the need for kicking in someones door with guns drawn when there are innocent children around. I would expect any reasonable person to react to protect their home and family from the intruders.

_________________
==================================
My God-given Rights are NOT "void where prohibited by law!"


Last edited by Panther on Mon May 24, 2010 8:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 8:08 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 11:06 am
Posts: 1750
Location: USA
I think Detroit SWAT/PD needs to cease and desist until they can fix their training/performance issues.

_________________
Life begins & ends cold, naked & covered in crap.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 8:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 17, 2000 6:01 am
Posts: 2813
Location: Massachusetts
I agree with that, but I would expand it to every PD across the country. I still think there are ways to apprehend a suspect without the police endangering innocent children. But don't misunderstand... if the suspect is in any way threatening innocent children, then neutralize the threat.

_________________
==================================
My God-given Rights are NOT "void where prohibited by law!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 12:12 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 11:06 am
Posts: 1750
Location: USA
I don't think it's a national problem. LAPD, NYPD, those guys set the standard, and I think most departments listen and emulate. Detroit... Ugh. They're 'special.'

_________________
Life begins & ends cold, naked & covered in crap.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 3:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 17, 2000 6:01 am
Posts: 2813
Location: Massachusetts
LAPD & NYPD have both had their own major problems over the years. I'm not so sure that's the highest standard tolive up to. I still think that protecting the lives of children is more important than being macho and throwing flash-bangs into a house that is known to contain children. Then again, I guess the collateral damage for children has become "acceptable" since Waco. I just happen to disagree that collateral damage of children can ever be acceptable. Harm a child, pay the price. But that's the Daddy in me talking.

_________________
==================================
My God-given Rights are NOT "void where prohibited by law!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 5:55 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 11:06 am
Posts: 1750
Location: USA
I don't think the girl's death was acceptable. I place the blame fully on the officer whose gun went off, and the training and rating program officers that deemed him qualified to be part of that kind of operation.

_________________
Life begins & ends cold, naked & covered in crap.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 1:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 17, 2000 6:01 am
Posts: 2813
Location: Massachusetts
Thanks Jason. I agree completely. IMNSHO, there are far too many who feel that they or their compatriots are qualified and that puts too many innocents in harm's way unnecessarily. Like I said, it's the Daddy in me that, even tho I have no relation to this child whatsoever, goes through the emotional roller-coaster when I hear of preventable things such as this. I get sad, then mad... tho nothing can be done to "make it right" at this point. I just can't help but think how I'd feel if it were my child. Then again, I wouldn't be willingly having a fugitive as a house-guest, especially where it could put my children in danger.

Take care...

_________________
==================================
My God-given Rights are NOT "void where prohibited by law!"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group