<a href="http://forums.uechi-ryu.com/viewtopic.p ... 3">this</a> thread.
These quotes are in order, but not neccesarily contiguous. I've used elipses to indictate breaks in the narrative. If I've messed it up somehow, it's because I'm incompetant, rather than malicious.
Therein lies the paradoxical fact that those who curse the Constitutional Republican society which treats them nicely and allows them free horizons (the very freedom to exercise their "subjective morality" within the boundaries of the law), are causing the disruption of former religion-based morality leading to the ultimate replacement of this society with one that is totalitarian and which oppresses and enslaves men. This paradox can only be understood under the assumption that those who espouse "subjective morality" have been manipulated by the Statist's subversive propaganda machines.
...
In fact, V.I. Lenin referred to those manipulated in such a fashion, on all levels, as " useful idiots ".
...
Interestingly enough, there are those that are currently pushing a "new world religion" and this is backed-up in the UN. Complete with all the ritual and trappings of a major religion , but with common moral values passed down over generations replaced with a system of moral values that teaches the superiority of the State through the "religion" of ecology (A belief system partially plagarized from certain Native American religious moral values and twisted to suit the desired results of an elite few).
...
Prior to the "revolutionary" days of the 60's, it was considered bad moral conduct to have indescriminate sexual relations, shirk one's responsibilities to country and society, act out in violent ways without provocation, contradict most of history with a belief in pure anarchy, and waste hours upon hours of time with drugs while expecting others to supply the needs of your existense. The destruction of those set moral values, in a great part, can be traced directly to the desire to destroy our morality-based society so that it may be replaced with a different society. Espousing the beliefs that such cultural and moral subversion are acceptable was (as previously posted from Castro) part of the revolutionary plans of the Communist/Socialist totalitarians who wished to replace our Constitutional Republican society with their totalitarian society. It seems self-evident that over the last three to four decades, those "subjective moral beliefs" have started to become the norm for a significant number amoung us. ( By the way, people who want to "conserve" the best that mankind has produced and handed down to us over the millennia are generally referred to as conservatives. While those that would try to sever the People from their rightful inheritance of the wisdom of the ages are the polar opposite of conservatives... and are politely known as "free-thinking liberals". )
...
Those who espouse subjective morality do believe that their ethics apply to others... As does the modern Liberal movement. The difference is that those who use subjective morality ( a code of moral conduct that is based on their own personal, convenient views ), generally contradict the handed-down for generations morality.