Uechi-Ryu.com

Discussion Area
It is currently Thu Oct 23, 2014 7:56 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2001 3:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2000 6:01 am
Posts: 493
Location: Framingham, MA USA
OK Robb, Panther and everyone. I did correctly quote the language on the statute, as first enacted in 1992, but I neglected to tell you that the constitutionality of the statute was challenged for vagueness because "harrassment" not defined, was vague and subjective, and the Court so held.
The statute was amended in 1996, and "harrassment" was deleted.

The other thing I expected to be pinned on was that the stalking statute. I don't think that our perp could be considered a stalker because the statute says that the action against the person must take place over a period of time (time not defined)

So it will be challenged again, I believe, for vagueness.

Thanks for the input.

Alan K


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group