Discussion Area
It is currently Tue Feb 28, 2017 10:19 am

All times are UTC

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 08, 2002 4:40 pm 

Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2000 6:01 am
Posts: 493
Location: Framingham, MA USA
When reading a news release in a legal newspaper, I was prompted to report this in these forums as being an example of how a case might be judged in view of special circumstances where the result could have been two sentences amounting to perhaps fifty years of jail time.

The law does recognize extenuating circumstances, but one must never rely on this as a typical outcome.

A Springfield man who said he acted in self-defense has been sentenced to four to six years in prison after pleading guilty to manslaughter in the stabbing deaths of two teenagers.

Judge Tina S. Page said at the recent sentencing in Hampden Superior Court that she had received 63 letters of support and requests for leniency for William Spriggs Jr.

She also pointed out that Spriggs, 23, who worked as a truck maintenance depot, had no prior criminal record. Spriggs told police that he had followed three men he believed were breaking into his girlfriends car into a parking lot when the May 2000 fight ensued.

Relatives of the victims, Ivan Pena and Michael Nieves, both 18, said they were outraged at the sentence and believed ti was because Pena and Nieves had been members of the Latin Kings street gang. “What was done today is not justice at all”, said Ivan Serrano, 31 of Springfield, a brother of Pena.

However prosecutor Carmen W. Picknally, Jr. told the judge in recommending a 12 to 14 year prison sentence that the victims’ gang background should not be a factor.

“These men were human beings; they had people who loved then…and their lives were unlawfully taken,” Picknally said,

The surviving man, Steven Eggleston, 23 of West Springfield, denied the three broke into the car, Picknally said.

Page had allowed Spriggs to remain free on $50,000 bail and electronic monitoring while awaiting trial. He was allowed to live at home, marry his girlfriend and work-part-time at the church.

Further facts concerning the case were not reported in this release.

His plea was probably the result of his inability to establish a prima facie self-defense plea, which is necessary under Massachusetts law to enable the judge to instruct the jury on the law of self-defense.

Spriggs would have had to have enough evidence, which if believed by a jury, would exonerate him.

Spriggs’ guilty plea of Manslaughter before a single judge may have been the result of his inability to establish the burden, and with the hope of a more lenient sentence.

You could take this type of case into different jurisdictions and states and gotten varying sentences.

What do you, as readers think?

Alan K

"The Goddess of Justice is Blind"

PostPosted: Thu May 09, 2002 1:44 am 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2000 6:01 am
Posts: 117
Location: Canada (for now)

With this brief description of the case you don't mention any other witnesses. Do you think the outcome would have been different if the third person had met his demise also? As in, no other witnesses to argue whether it was self defense or not. Or would the state still have pressed charges?

On a side note; having put down two gang members, I hope he is segregated away from the general population while serving his time.


Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group