Watching Martial Arts

Contributors offers insight into the non-physical side of the Martial Arts, often ignored when discussing self-defense.

Moderator: gmattson

Watching Martial Arts

Postby Dana Sheets » Fri Dec 30, 2005 12:22 pm

http://www.plumpub.com/info/Articles/wa ... ung_fu.htm

Watching Kung Fu

-Debbie Shayne

I love Kung Fu, yet you could fit all my physical experience of it in one Chinese boot. However it has been my privilege, for almost twenty years, to watch it.

Some of that time has been spent behind a camera. The nice thing about a lens is that it focuses. It has taught me what to look for in the practitioner, the essence of the move or the performance. Initially, sitting on the sidelines, I paid attention to the separate parts of the static body: feet, hands, shoulders, head, etc. If you watch much kung fu, you don’t need more than your eyes to tell you where the performer’s tension lies. In the worst cases, you see the hunched shoulders, the locked elbows, knees, or wrists, the thrust chin. But what are you seeing in the better cases? It’s not just the correction of the above tensions. It is the involvement of the waist. When the waist engages, the separate parts now work together. The tip of the left willow palm talks to the toe of the right foot in its bow stance. The shoulders, relaxed, allow the two extended arms to become one long arm connected across the back. And in every posture you see, also, the mind.

Photography with a still camera makes you very sensitive to movement. After observing the body I next look for the qualities, such as timing, fluidity, familiarity, etc. One of my favorite performances was by an 80 year-old man in China, wielding a Kwan knife. While he was not as "beautiful" as the young, springy wushuist who preceded him, his movements were some of the most graceful I’d ever seen. His obvious familiarity with his weapon enabled him to move that heavy kwan as though he were cutting the air with his own arm. His waist guided each step and seemed, also, to support his limbs in their complicated maneuvers. His timing was unhurried, and each move poured into the next like water. He made no attempts at fancy stances, his footwork almost casual, yet each bow stance was perfect, each cat precise. The majority of my spectating is done, not at tournaments, but at schools. I watch students from twenty to seventy years old practice their forms and basics in small classes. Although most of the students have less experience than the ‘masters’ at the demonstrations, they are fascinating to observe.

You can sometimes see the seeds that will grow into great art, and it’s not just the talent that shines, but work and attitude. A student who looks forward to the opportunity of a new exercise, the work of a new form, is a student who moves more freely with less tension, a student who is not bounded by the daily restrictions that may inhabit the rest of his life. In a funny way, watching a student like this is like seeing the physical manifestation of his trust—not just in himself, but in his teacher and in his art. It’s a willingness to push past his own expectations—to surprise himself—and from this grows engagement: of the limbs, of the waist, of the mind.

This, ultimately, is what satisfies in a fine performance. Talent is not as rare as this attitude which, along with hours and hours of work, is at the foundation of fluid movement, expert timing, even strength and endurance. When you see a performance that takes your breath away, part of the excitement is sensing the lingering presence of the obstacles overcome, alongside the polished product. That’s why, for me, an old man with a heavy kwan is a hundred times more interesting than a young wushuist with her paper thin sword, no matter how quickly she whips and twirls it.

So, I raise my camera and focus. If I am lucky—if the martial artist is good—I will be able to find that holographic spot which contains the "energy" of the move. I shoot, then lower my camera, and watch, and watch, and watch.
Did you show compassion today?
User avatar
Dana Sheets
 
Posts: 2714
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 6:01 am

Watching Kung Fu

Postby John Giacoletti » Mon Jan 02, 2006 1:42 am

Thanks for posting, Dana. The artical is a splendid and articulate appreciation of art and kata.

Those who limit their training to street application and self defense overlook many of these asthetic benefits.
There is much to make of every moment.
User avatar
John Giacoletti
 
Posts: 451
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 3:08 am
Location: Largo, FL

Postby David Mott » Wed Jan 11, 2006 5:21 pm

I like this thread very much. Too often people don't know what to look for or how to look at another martial artist. And if you know these things you know how to "look" in your own body.

Besides looking overall, I first observe the feet to see if the person is grounded and rooted. Next, I observe the centre or tantien (or hara) to see if it it exists and then if it is directing the movements. Then I go to the eyes to see if intent and spirit are present. The last thing that I'm interesting in observing is the moving parts (fists, arms legs etc.) and then I look to see if they are completely integrated with the rest of the body and if the intent flows through them and extends beyond the body.

It's a simple check list but one which, I think, can benefit us all as we practise.

D.Mott
David Mott
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 7:13 pm
Location: Toronto, Ont. Canada

Postby Dana Sheets » Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:47 pm

This is a short excerpt from a recent article in Patrick McCarthy's newsletter
Uchinadi©
An Informal Journal for the Progressive Traditionalist
4th Quarter 2005, No. 41
IRKRS

Article:
Okinawa’s Bushi
Karate Gentlemen
By Charles C. Goodin

I think this applies to the discussion as well:

Was the problem with the word “Bushi” itself? Fortunately, my sensei, Katsuhiko Shinzato, is a professor of linguistics at the Okinawa International University. I emailed a series of questions to him about this subject. He explained that although “Bushi” uses the same kanji and is pronounced the same in Okinawa and Japan, it means different things. In Japan, a “Bushi” was a member of the warrior class. In Okinawa, the term “Bushi” was honorific. It was used to refer to a Karate practitioner who was respected and revered not only for of his superior martial arts skill, but for being a civilized, principled gentleman as well. “Bushi” did not mean the Japanese “samurai.” As evidence of this, even the Okinawan King’s official guards, who were referred to as “samurai” in Okinawa, were not referred to as “Bushi.”


and this later quote

Walter Dailey, who then was the publisher of Bugeisha: Traditional Martial Artist. Daily had studied Shorin-Ryu in Okinawa under Zenryo Shimabukuro...

“Karate makes us into gentlemen.” ... “That is what is missing in Karate today!”...
“Character is the goal. Karate training is simply an excuse for developing character. Blood, sweat and tears are to form the character of the student. Karate is a means to an end.”

Character is not one of the benefits of Karate training. It is the goal. Without it, there is no Karate, only athletics.
Did you show compassion today?
User avatar
Dana Sheets
 
Posts: 2714
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 6:01 am

Postby Brian King » Sun Apr 16, 2006 7:11 pm

Thanks for posting this thread. Very well written article.

See you on the floor soon
Friends
Brian King
Brian King
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 6:08 am
Location: Seattle, Washington USA


Return to Mind-Body-Spirit Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest