
Where is the fun in that ?

Moderator: Available
George has banned public stoning, Guantanamo Bay is closing, and Rickrolling isn't fashionable any more. What's a moderator to do?robb buckland wrote:
Where is the fun in that ?
Yeah, I heard something about that awhile back, like almost a year ago, I think. Can't really remember now...Bill Glasheen wrote:Guantanamo Bay is closing
Well the way I figure it, Barry is keeping it around long enough to get a few more movies in...mhosea wrote:Yeah, I heard something about that awhile back, like almost a year ago, I think. Can't really remember now...Bill Glasheen wrote:Guantanamo Bay is closing
Possibly. Maybe we'll get a My Cousin Vinny sequel with Billy and Stan getting picked up by the US Military in Jalalabad while on their way from Uzbekistan to Delhi, India. They get flown to GTMO, then Vinny tries to defend them in a military tribunal, only Vinnie doesn't know anything about military tribunals. See? Works.Bill Glasheen wrote: Well the way I figure it, Barry is keeping it around long enough to get a few more movies in...
The idea was that the mutation of kata over generations of teaching and learning does occur but not to the extent that the kata becomes completely altered. Yes, elements of the kata might become exaggerated but ignoring things like speed and extension of technique kata probably remain fairly well intact; however if someone decided to deliberately alter a kata that would be a different matter.maxwell ainley wrote:Martin ,
In ref; to a Ryoute mag article I think it was Traditional Karate ,there was a series of shapes that reflected a concept in Ryoute , was there a slight deviation in the shapes ? but they still reflected the given shape ,if you recall this ? can you elaborate .
Max.
This hypothesis - if properly supported - would be an important finding.martinclewett wrote:
The idea was that the mutation of kata over generations of teaching and learning does occur but not to the extent that the kata becomes completely altered. Yes, elements of the kata might become exaggerated but ignoring things like speed and extension of technique kata probably remain fairly well intact; however if someone decided to deliberately alter a kata that would be a different matter.
Yes but I wouldn't call it pushing hands I'd call it hand grappling which I believe is one of the possible translations of tegumi. I don't like the term tegumi since it can mean things that I don't practise i.e. wrestling.Bill Glasheen wrote:So if you are still around, Mr. Clewett...
If you couldn't tell, I think you and your peers are doing some bold exploration. And while you feel it may not have gotten you what you wanted when you first started, in my opinion a different approach can get you where you wanted to be back when the experimentation started. In other words, right idea but try a different path. (I'll quote my previous post if this is helpful.)
And while I applaud (and share) your idea of enjoying the journey and not obsessing on the martial, I think the martial aspect is an important anchor for all that we do.
I'd like to know more about whether you're continuing with the push hands exercises.
- Bill
It doesn't matter anyway since it's possible to create your own kata; if you haven't already then I thoroughly recommend it. At the end you'll be in the luxurious position of having a kata that you know the exact applications for. N.B. I don't recommend just coping older ones; start from scratch and first principles.Bill Glasheen wrote:This hypothesis - if properly supported - would be an important finding.martinclewett wrote:
The idea was that the mutation of kata over generations of teaching and learning does occur but not to the extent that the kata becomes completely altered. Yes, elements of the kata might become exaggerated but ignoring things like speed and extension of technique kata probably remain fairly well intact; however if someone decided to deliberately alter a kata that would be a different matter.
We all have debates within our martial communities over "what the original choreographers intended." I personally gravitate to themes that are principles-based. Others go for very literal and/or single applications. To some extent that all depends upon both the kata (Sanchin is quite general; Seisan is a bit more literal) and the practitioner (I'm like The Borg anyhow). But we all like to operate under the assumption that our martial movement is reasonably close to what the author intended. Without that, the value of kata training becomes someone diminished. Not completely lost mind you, but certainly a study of a different nature.
- Bill
Naturally I won't speak for others. But I have - out of necessity. I found a need to teach all the kicks of karate to my students so they would learn to defend against them. Before I knew it, I had a 38 technique form. I made it a dojo requirement to literally several thousand students.martinclewett wrote:
It doesn't matter anyway since it's possible to create your own kata; if you haven't already then I thoroughly recommend it.
True. However it's worth noting that I constantly tweak the form a bit. The structure remains more or less the same. But I find a need to add this, remove that, adjust something else, etc. And since it's "mine," I don't have to take any cr@p from anyone when I tweak it.martinclewett wrote:
At the end you'll be in the luxurious position of having a kata that you know the exact applications for.
I believe George put a copy of it somewhere on this website. It has me permanently frozen in time as a younger man.martinclewett wrote:
If you have or do I'm always interested to see the results; since they are valuable research into the nature of how form relates to function irrespective of whether they are similar to traditional kata or not.