Bill Glasheen wrote:
In my opinion, Jason, all this is a distraction. People are concerned about getting or keeping a job and paying their bills in a difficult global economic situation, and folks want to make a big deal about social issues. I'm sure these issues are important to those who experience them, but Maslov would have a thing or two to say about the relative hierarchy of needs here. In the grand scheme of things I really don't give a damn. It doesn't have to be made an issue, and nobody needs to have their noses tweaked.
No collection of crowds or happenstance is going to change the fundamental needs of our economy, and the clear dichotomy between the Republican consensus of how to fix it, and that of the Democrats. I get that, Bill, and I agree.
Quote:
I'm sure those associated with actions that caused or perpetuated a dismal economy would love to have these social distractions as reasons to vote for their candidate. Sorry... I'm not listening.
I don't see these things as reasons to vote for 'the other guy,' I really don't.
Quote:
As for the soldiers, I just want them to do their jobs and come home safely.- Bill
Amen.
Of the candidates, only two have really been out there promoting their economic plans. Perry says he has one on the way. The front-runner got sucker-punched with that straw-poll result. It's interesting that though Santorum handed out all the social red meat at the debate, it was Cain who plugged his economic plan and got the
very decisive win.