Hi Bill,
Thanks. I finally was able to get to these links and listen to the interviews for a while.
Pretty good stuff, but from my take of it…considering the Japanese seemed to annex the kingdom in the period 1872 to 1879, perhaps this is an example of the disruption in the interview.
As in the interview where as many fled conscription to Hawaii, Kanbun chose China
clearly a change in karate was already underway and maybe complete , and it seems this change would only continue and perhaps even heighten when the market went from in house family training to military preparation and nationalism , and post war to teaching and expanding of karate internationally .
The questions to Uechi of course were was what affect this had on the Uechi style, Kanbun of course resuming teaching for clearly martial reasons, and of course his source being Chinese and not Okinawan, it points more to looking at the cultural state of martial arts in china of the time, and to the changes perhaps affected on the method on his return and broadened teachings and subsequently over the passage of years.
The highlight to me of the interview was the acknowledgement of the brutality and effectiveness of karate, combined with the culture and restraint and humility of the Ryu kyus, and the explanation of the political and sociological context that makes such attributes explainable and understandable and maybe even tactical, and a real example for everyone to aspire.
If anything, I am more partial to the work of Patrick McCarthy when it comes to discussions of Okinawan karate. In my view, there is nobody who 'has it' like he does, in all aspects of it.
http://www.martialartsview.com/index-100.html