Van Canna wrote:
http://www.edmunds.com/subaru/legacy/2013/
What do you make of this, Bill?
Well the reviews are all over the place, so I take each with a grain of salt.
Edmunds wrote:
Cons
Weak base stereo; unimpressive six-cylinder fuel economy and acceleration.
Well any base stereo is weak, hence the strong aftermarket.
In my last vehicle I ripped everything out and had a custom system built in it. Alpine stereo with XM radio, bluetooth, subwoofer built (hidden) into the back wheel well, etc. The place that put it together to my specifications was so excited about the result that they asked to hold on to my van for a few days to show other customers.
The vehicle I got - under cost by the way - had a 440 watt Harmon Kardon stereo system with XM radio and bluetooth. I have no complaints. The speakers aren't the best, but they're good enough for most. And as an FYI... If you do long trips across remote areas, both bluetooth and XM are a blessing. I have friends who keep me company with phone calls, and I never lose a radio signal.
The six-cylinder economy isn't the best. But it's better than average, requires only regular gas, is naturally aspirated, and doesn't have any hybrid electronics. It's built to last a very long time, and be relatively inexpensive to operate over the long run. All factors need to be taken into account when considering "economy." I thought about the 4-cylinder engine, but I feared it straining on the hills of West Virginia.
The 4-cylinder engine had unimpressive acceleration, but not the six. I'm not sure what the reviewer was smoking when writing this article. I have to be very gentle on the gas in town. The car gets up to speed - and beyond - very fast without even coming close to pushing it.
There are other things to consider here. I don't look at peak torque and peak power ratings. The last in fact is bogus. Torque is what pushes you back in your seat. And ideally you want that torque to be flat across the RPM band. Very few vehicles do this. Electrics do by nature, but right now the battery technology hasn't matured. Diesels have very broad torque curves - and at low RPM - but Subaru has elected not to bring their boxer turbodiesel engine over to this side of the pond. So if you want push-back-in-your-chair acceleration over a broad RPM range, you pretty much have to go with the horizontal 6. It does fine.
Also... Not even considered in this or most reviews is the lateral performance of the vehicle. I like to see slalom run stats and max lateral g-forces for how the vehicle will behave in spirited driving. Quarter mile speeds just tell you how quickly you'll get a ticket. The ability to do an emergency avoidance maneuver with confidence or take a tight turn is something that drivers appreciate. Subaru's boxer engine design and AWD puts it in a class by itself. So in terms of every day drivability, I'll take what the 3.6R offers.
Finally... what this and many reviews don't consider are other factors like safety and reliability. Subaru maxes out on all the IIHS safety ratings. And these vehicles are built to be driven hard. The civilian vehicles borrow from the WRX STI rally car heritage. That video review shows you just a hint of the ability to "drift" safely on loose surfaces. Just as an example of how extreme this can get, this video is worth a look.
Ken Block - Gymkhana OneBill