Uechi-Ryu.com

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pant_xwq ... =endscreen

here we see the terminal power of 'steely bones' and pointed weapons of Uechi.

_________________
Van

Ray,

As to the value of kata...we can see that kata were developed to ensure that the most effective methods of a particular individual or style were not lost. Kata can therefore be defined as 'a way to record and summarise the key combative techniques and principles of a fighting style'.

And here is my formidable student, Jim Hulse, who has made a science of KOs following the lines of force and direction of Uechi Kata.

http://www.uechiryu-karate.co.uk/mainpage.htm

I would recommend Jim, above any other UK instructors of Uechi...you will be awed.

_________________
Van

This is precisely what Rick Wilson does so well.

_________________
Van

Ray,

Let me know if you want to train Uechi with Jim Hulse, I will put in a recommendation for you. He is a real nice guy.

_________________
Van

Thanks Van,
I'm having some issues with my hips at the present time, got the hospital in February ,also I don't think Jim is close to where I live. I do respect Jim's approach though, incorporating nerve strikes to his Uechi, I think he has a video out on it.I intent to get a few of the more interesting videos on aspects of MA soon, that will be one of them

Van: “So based on my personal experiences and training modalities, the best way to improve 'fighting abilities' is to first become aware of what the body wants to do naturally from an outside stimulus, and then build a simple combative system around that natural response.”

A very important statement. I haven’t converted my “Oh Crap to OK” drill yet but that will come later.

Ray: Sorry to hear about your hip – hopefully all goes well in February.

_________________
Rick Wilson - http://wpd-rc.com/

Some thoughts:

Rory Miller commented in one of his books that amateurs want to demonstrate their dominance while a professional doesn’t care if you know you were dominated they just get the job done.

The concept of a “fair fight” is a mean to express dominance. On an equal basis (or perceived equal basis) I beat you man to man” (or replace with your gender).

This concept is propagated by fictional media. The gunfighters meeting in the middle of the street. Most bad ass cowboys ambushed the guys they killed.

The need to dominate or be alpha generates the monkey dance.

Most often stories we hear of a person “walking away” from a fight really are that unspoken communication went on and the aggressor backed down.

Now in some situations not appearing to be a victim may well be what gets you out of the situation but most often that isn’t the case and the stories relate that their eyes locked and the guy got the message he had a fight on his hands if…

Truly walking away from a fight means the aggressor feels they dominated you and they cowered you into running away.

When we do actually walk away there is often a massive reaction. I have been pondering this effect for a while. Certainly there is a rush of chemical cocktail because an altercation might take place and that can take its toll but this effect can ride you for days or even weeks and for some years. Reliving the experience only this time you did not walk away the fight happened and of course you dominate the aggressor.

It has struck me that while there is a physical component the long term effects are because we do not have a professional’s approach to violence and that puts us at a disadvantage.

You see if there was a true self defence need to remove the aggressor the proper response would be to leave and do it when you have all the advantages. Most of the time if you can walk away unharmed then there is no self-defence component for an engagement you initiated later.

Remember the definition for self-defence I am using is Ray’s: that I don’t get hurt - so if I can walk away unharmed then I have succeeded and anything that reengages the situation is counter to self-defence.

Leaving out those situations where you must demonstrate you will not be a victim, the need to show dominance is based in ego or lack of self-confidence.

Hey I love to say I have never been caught up in that ego thing but even most of the disputes I’ve been involved in on the internet have really just been me caught up in a virtual monkey dance. And those are what have generated my interest in this topic. I have dealt with a lot of in person conflict and very angry in my face conflict and stayed very professional so why had this not carried over to the internet? What circumstances or how did I allow myself not to apply the things I have done so many times.

Because if it can happen “here” then it can happen out there.

I have walked away from a fight. I have had students walk away from fights. We all suffered the effects which mean that while we achieved one training goal we weren’t all the way there yet. Maybe I have improved with time – only circumstance will tell.

Can we disengage the portion of ego that makes the wrong choices?

How do we train for this in any realistic way?

I think the difference between is that if we personalize a situation then ego kicks in, the need to dominate or even be right kicks in and we enter the monkey dance.

In my work it is not personal and I can keep it that way and stay professional.

Professional vs. amateur.

Professional is doing whatever you need to so that you don’t get hurt.

The amateur does things that might get them hurt.

We have a drill that kicks in the personal in a hurry – I will post this later on in the thread.

_________________
Rick Wilson - http://wpd-rc.com/

i am very proud to be one of Joe's students. I have had the privledge of training with Gushi Sensei a number of times at Joe's Milford dojo. Joe continues to pass on the traditions of his teachers over the years, Gushi sensei and Walter Mattson. Hard pressed to find better instruction anyplace.

http://karateandkobudo.com/

I think one of the luckiest things, athletically anyway, that I ever did was to discover Walter Mattson's dojo in my hometown years ago. Joe taught almost every Monday night for Walter.

Quote

Ray: Sorry to hear about your hip – hopefully all goes well in February.I had been doing Wing Chun but noticed a pain in my hip when I stood in their sanchin stance,which I later found out was arthritis in my good leg. So I am somewhat restricted in how I train in the future.

Quote
"The concept of a “fair fight” is a mean to express dominance. On an equal basis (or perceived equal basis) I beat you man to man” (or replace with your gender).

This concept is propagated by fictional media. The gunfighters meeting in the middle of the street. Most bad ass cowboys ambushed the guys they killed.

The need to dominate or be alpha generates the monkey dance.

. In my experience violent criminals can be quite cowardly in what they do, but often their peers praise them for their callousness. Such as initiiates in gangs were they are asked to kill somebody in cold blood, even attacking the unarmed or defenceless is not looked at as cowardly. In the Hell's angel bike gang if you fight one member then all the others are expected to join in, with little chance of a fair fight.
Also one thing that may be overlooked here is the ability for criminals to justify the way they behave

http://news.sky.com/story/1014177/teena ... ht-on-cctv

The guy who did this didn't like the way the girl looked at him

Ray,

Hope all for the best when you in the hospital…will this be a hip replacement?

Rick,

Most insightful post…look forward to your drill to try and avoid emotional high-jacking.

_________________
Van

This is serious business due to hard wired perceptions of 'manhood' especially if we are trained martial artists. Not easy to overcome as one will become a different person under the amygdala high-jack.
http://www.myevt.com/news/retrain-your- ... ala-hijack

_________________
Van

In my studies with lethal force instructors...they try to inculcate the fact that you can educate your subconscious to 'back down' without much side effects...by constantly telling yourself you are carrying 'deadly force' in your holster/pocket...which results in terminal solutions for the opponent and also for you in unintended consequences easy to predict.

So you look at the threat, you then realize you can easily kill him, but you let him off easy realizing the price you have to pay.

This acts as a 'manhood buffer'...

_________________
Van

very good points Van

I think its very dangerous to invest too much of your identity in being a martial artist

weve all been highjacked by our beleifs on this forum ,and thats amoungst friends.

I find as i get older and with more experience how a well rounded life is as important in self defence as any martial skills.

Its naive to beleive you have or deserve any influence over someone else,and that opinions are like assholes everyone has one

that the more holistic approach to martial arts and putting your ego in your conduct rather than your competence is more tactical,and more rewarding.

Easier said than done ,That perfection of character is more rare than that perfect technique .....

Stryke,

Your post is right on target.

There is a subconscious 'empowerment'/'entitlement' _effect that can take hold in martial arts practitioners…all besieging 'shadows of grey' if you will, that can be very self destructive at times.

Because of our training, there is a tendency to think of ourselves as 'superior fighters' no matter what the challenges and the ingrained empowerment can mate righteousness_ propelling us to 'stand our ground' whereas backing down or avoiding would have been the better part of personal valor…

The end result, sometimes being that 'but for' _our 'training mentalities' we would have taken the common sense way out…rather than the opposite resulting in dire consequences.

There is a tendency in some trained martial artists to draw a precocious 'line in the sand' read that [aggressive, ahead of time, beforehand, bold, brassy, cocky, flippant, forward, fresh, nervy, premature, presumptuous, pushy, quick, sassy, smart-alecky] when facing 'hairy' situations and even forum discussions as you and Rick point out. We have all been there.



It is easy to imagine the abyss such a person can fall into.

Recall the case I investigated and reported here years back: a young 'tough' karate black-belt, meets his new girlfriend living in very bad part of Boston, on the top floor of tenement building.

He soon finds out that the girl had recently broken up with an ex boyfriend, a Jamaican gangbanger, who was stalking her.

Against his better judgment, clouded by his martial arts 'entitlement process' he finds himself isolated and ambushed one late night, in a darkened stairwell, when leaving his girl's apartment to go home.

He dies a terrible death with his throat cut by the gangbanger.

I was on the scene the next morning while the blood spurts were being cleaned up from the walls and ceiling.

He had been warned by his girl about this possibility…yet he 'machoed' it out…refusing to be 'punked out' to use an expression we read on my forum once by some @#$%$ poster.

At times, as you point out…a large investment in martial identity can lead to an early grave, as in this case.

_________________
Van

I cant help but feel it points back to Rick post about the amateur versus the proffesional

I feel it very naive to be overly confident in matters of self protection

while not necessary to be paranoid, one should never be confident in dealing with such a random beast like violence.

The proffessional knows the price , and takes every effort to avoid risk, and when unavoidable uses what tactics and preperation possible to be overwhelming and negate all risk as much as possible.

It mirrors the Okinawan tradition, the politeness ofthe Okinawan traders and there efforts to appear harmless,all the while training there martial skills,convincing both the Chinese and Japanese they were no threat and going about there buisness.

Tactics..

surely if we are talking training for reality, Discretion is the better part of valour