Moderator: Bill Glasheen
jorvik wrote:you [the United States] keep on indiscriminately killing the women and children of other nations
jorvik wrote:this from ... Dr.Paul Craig Roberts
jorvik wrote:The term " radical Islam" is meaningless
jorvik wrote:the IRA were terrorists with an agenda.
jorvik wrote:Do you get it yet Bill?
Bill Glasheen wrote:Modern U.S. warfare? No.
Valkenar wrote:For all that we try hard not to kill innocent people, ... we are willfully killing them.
Valkenar wrote:And we should also acknowledge that this does contribute to terrorism.
Bill Glasheen wrote:Valkenar wrote:For all that we try hard not to kill innocent people, ... we are willfully killing them.
I rest my case.
Those are your own words, Justin, absent the circumlocution.
Bill wrote:Valkenar wrote:And we should also acknowledge that this does contribute to terrorism.
So you're going to invoke the "she deserved to be raped" argument as well?
Oxygen contributes to terrorism as well, Justin. So do innocent people. Without them, we'd have no terrorism.
Valkenar wrote:that is not my argument, and it's disingenuous of you to characterize it as such.
Bill Glasheen wrote:Bullhockey. You're implying innocent people deserved to be slaughtered en masse. It's the "she deserved to be raped" argument. I'm not pulling punches here. That's exactly as I see it.
Bill Glasheen wrote:Bullhockey.
jorvik wrote:It's you who doesn't get it Bill ....look it's quite simple. If a country kills the innocent civillians of another country, then their own citizens become fair game.
Feur wrote: Hi Bill! Hockey and Bull are two words that the folks in Canukistan can't conceive of placing together. You trying to start a holy war with the folks up north?...we take this game rather serious! Just saying hi!...Good luck with these two Kind of like conditioning..init!
~ Laird GM FEUR
Son, we live in a world that has walls. And those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lt. Weinberg? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Santiago and you curse the Marines. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know: that Santiago's death, while tragic, probably saved lives. And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives...You don't want the truth. Because deep down, in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that wall. You need me on that wall. We use words like honor, code, loyalty...we use these words as the backbone to a life spent defending something. You use 'em as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom I provide, then questions the manner in which I provide it! I'd rather you just said thank you and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon and stand a post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you're entitled to!
Your damned if you do and your damned if you don't
Stryke wrote:Sorry Bill if this is further off topic.
"Bradley Manning is no patriot. He's a punk who decided to get back at his unit and the military in general after he felt was being mistreated. I hope he gets more than this dumb bastard: "
what about those jerks in the gunship, are they brave patriots for killing unarmed innocent civilians??
I'll tell you now there is soooooo much hypocracy when americans talk about themselves and what they have done.....kill a few dozen at a innocents at a wedding party and it's " Collateral damage".....and then three die in Boston and it's an atrocity.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests