David
MAD - Mutual Assured Destruction...that is my bottom line. I don't think I going to beat the BG(s) but I am committed to taking him (and any other) with me straight to HELL!
I am inclined towards this attitude, slightly modified. I make it known thru body language, eye contact, verbal cues, that while I may not be the toughest guy on the block, I am not the weakest one either. I may be afraid, but I am gonna do my darndest to make sure I ACT thru my fear rather than freeze up in the midst of fear. My intentions MUST be backed up by strong convictions, a readiness for combat at the drop of a hat, not necessarily because I like it, but because that it was is called for at that very moment.
The above is how I act if I am pissed off, stressed out, or otherwise just feeling like a jerk.
When I am feeling good about myself, not overworked, and otherwise things are going well, my approach is different. I make enough eye contact to show that I am not afraid, but not directly challenging, enough to ascertain general intentions and positioning (I need to know when the BG is closing the distance significantly). By not focusing entirely on BG, I keep my senses attuned to whether or not BG has accomplices, escape routes, and available weapons that either I or BG may be able to make use. If the BG closes the distance, I make assertive gestures and more assertive glances to better assess BG and send some signals still somewhat muted, but the intention is there (like MAD).
Where I think I begin to really differ is whether or not to act or react. In most cases I would probably react, rather than act, but I also my reflexes to train to act as well, thinking that lacking that skill, my arsenal would be lacking a critical weapon.
Rather than to merely act directly in all situations, I prefer to utilize strategy when and where possible. I think all are agreed that most likely BG will only act like the BG if he(or she) percieves they are highly likely to succeed (some dont care-not all BG are cut from the same cloth). The way to win against such a BG is to make sure you are aware and perceptive, especially at those times that it is most critical to do so (like when getting in or out of a car, or going to or from the parking lot, upon entering the home or office). You may not say or do anything to ward off an attack other than merely maintain a strong posture (but not super aggressive); you probably wont even know that you just won an encounter as they wont give you a trophy for this...
And you gotta think outside the box, but only after scrutinizing every gosh darn item inside the box, and after that, go look back in the box again, I hear there are some pretty cool stuff in that Uechi box. Remember, the saying is "think outside of the box", not "forget the box".
Go with your gut instincts...... If your gut tells you that some guy that just got on the elevator with you is creepy, then get off the elevator before the door closes. You might spend more time waiting for elevators, but you may save yourself from something horrible.....( a recent issue of Business 2.0 magazine had a great article about going with the gut feelings as it applies to business and such strategies have been applied in the U.S. marines)
Before becoming a Muslim I studied zen philosophy and I found it very useful. Live in the moment. Live not in either the past or the future. What happened to me in the past has happened, it cant be changed, only how I percieve what happened can change at this point. and what I hope to do in the future isnt real until it happens.
Some of you folks probably know more about zen than I, but my understanding about how to achieve the attitude that Sensei Canna refers to can readily come from internalizing the following quote, "You, me, you die, I die ". We all die. That is one of the few things we all have in common; we all are going to die. Knowing that, it is easier to ACT, deliberately and consciously to maintain that life as long as possible, not in the absence of fear, but despite the fear, and the adrenaline rush (practicing acting thru the coctail is important, IMHO, learning how to act rather than be perilized. I need to work on this a bit more. I have to admit that there are times when I tend to freeze up. I am trying to eradicate that tendency.)
One of the reasons I have trouble generating power in the dojo is that I know my life is not on the line. I have respect for my partners and generally do not want to injure them. I practice not so much of the traditional blunt force trauma karate but the eye gauging, tendon grabbing, groin thrashing, double arm-headlock, grappling, whatever it takes to get the job done without much regard for whether or not the BG will be able to breathe after I put 40% of my power concentrated solely on his(or her) windpipe. I fight for my life and before I am prepred to fight to the death I make darned sure that the altercation cannot be avoided.
Part of the mindset I attempt to attain is the aikido one. It is harder to attain as I have never stepped inside an aikido dojo. Supposedly that art is about spiritual harmony, although I have heard that many aikido stylists have as many macho baggage issues as some other stylists, but the idea that I like the most is that you never expend more than 40% of your energy, leaving 60% in reserve.
If I cant hit hard to begin with, then how is limiting the use of my powere gonna help? Think outside the box for a second. Think not only of the weapons on your body that you can hit someone with, but think of the greater objects around you that you can hit someone with.
"The bigger they come the harder they fall"???? True or False? or how about, "The bigger they come the harder they hit"???? I think that no mattter how big you are, or how hard you train there is no part of your body that u could hit with that would be more powerful than if you hit them with the ground. While this is not always an option (no option is always viable), the harder someone tries to hit or kick you, the easier it is to make them hit the concrete with their face or hit the wall with their face. It is hard to take someone down from a jabbing punch necause they are not committing (they have reserved most of their strength.
A question to ponder, Todd, is what signals did he read that made him feel comfortable saying this to you?
I would like to think that he feels comforatble because in our discussion I tried to listen to what he said and respond to that which we had in common, trying to find areas of commonality, rather than focusing on areas of disagreement.
I need to trust that what he says is what he feels, not an attack on me. He needs to trust that I wont attack him for what he says. My attempts were hopefully not to merely persuade him to my point of view, but rather to come away with an understanding of where he comes from and see what he does well that maybe I can pick up on. Whatever portion of what I said that he agrees with or values, he can take with him and whatever he does not agree with, at least he is more apt to look at it with an open mind.
I learned this technique from a Graduate course at UMass Boston in the creative and critical thinking department (this 3 credit course was condensed to 2 weeks in January, 1999. The class was called dialogue and it was taught by a WWII veteran. At first I was super duper skeptical about this old man and how much he could teach us as he appeared about as frail as they come (I came to the table, as they say, with an arm full of personal baggage, preconceptions and issues). He would bring what he called a "talking stick" that in fact did not speak, but allowed the holder of the stick to be the one who was allowed to speak while the others were supposed to listen while suspending judgement of what was being said (which is not easy).
In some ways that class was both good training for how to deal with forums as well as BG's. In a thread on the VSD forum, I think Lee mentioned the notion of not drinking the drink that is being offered to you when someone tries to verbally escalate a situation by either deliberate or subconscious verbal and non-verbal (physical) baiting. By suspending judgement of what is being said, it is easier to not be offended.
One of the underlying notions of the dialogue process is that this is not a debate where I try to argue my point without listening to yours, but a dialogue in which I try to find commonalities of understanding from which we can construct shared meaning.
You think me successful????? Oh please say yes!!!!! Please dont say no!!!! My whole self concept is riding on this one.......
Sensei, if you will, please reveal your insights as to what signals did he read that made him feel comfortable saying this to me would be most appreciated.
David, feel free to jump in......
Dana, Are we doing ok or should we park this some place else?
PEACE, ATH
Call me Akil, or call me Todd, or even call me Harvey, just dont call me late for dinnah
[/quote]