Did I work my arse off to get where I am? Damn right. Should I be ashamed of that, or choose not to draw from my experiences? Should I elect not to fill the teacher and leader shoes I have earned?Stryke wrote:
Perhaps you dont understand your not on a pedastool Bill , many folks are just as commited and passionate about martial arts as you , the dont get it stuff dont cut it , In fact I`m sure Mike , Myself and others could teach you a few things , and vice versa
Where is the pedestal, Marcus? My language may be harsh. I may not have the best people skills in the world. (I wouldn't be alone on that one.) I would in fact be the first to admit it. But I hardly put myself on a pedestal. Try working with me some time. You know that you have an open invitation to drop by this part of the world. I guarantee you that a place could be found to put you up - even if it was my own home.
And yes, you COULD teach me a thing or two. That's why I have this Forum, Marcus. That's why I have a "Roundtable" format to these discussions. That's why as a professional researcher, I have dedicated myself to being a student of life. The more I know, the more I understand my own limitations and the more hungry I become for more knowledge.
You grossly misunderstood my comment, Marcus.Stryke wrote:
... your refusal to comment further is one of the most highjacking ways to hold a discussion .
Why did I say this?
I said that because I thought Mike's post and your post after it dealt with all the issues. I didn't feel a need to challenge Mike for his response to my post. Mike had an opinion on the matter, and he expressed it. Mike didn't like my attitude, and he got it off his chest. Good for Mike!!! You then made what *I* thought was a perfectly reasonable and frankly amusing post. It was eloquent and magnanimous.Bill Glasheen wrote:
I think all was said that needed to be said.
All that needed to be said was said. And that is exactly what I communicated.
Instead, you and Laird assumed the worst. I have to clean unnecessary insults from a perfectly good thread. Why? What did all that accomplish?
Please, everyone, go back and read what was posted. There was no battle to be had. There was no need to run to the defense of anyone. If Mike and I want to disagree, let us disagree in peace. The discussion just MIGHT be interesting!
In my professional world, disagreement is de rigueur. It is part of the idea vetting process that ultimately leads to one (or more) points of evidence-based consensus. It is only personal if someone chooses to make it so.
- Bill