Very interesting thread and appreciate everyone's comments. Unfotunately, I can't response to all.
Expecting the federal government to bail us all out of problems is demanding a recipe for financial disaster.
I don't expect the federal government to bail us all out and I certainly didn't make any statement to that effect. I was focussing specifically on those things that should have been done and have been cooberated by state level engineer corps. No one can say with certainty how things would be differnt had the fed opened up its wallet and funded at the levels recommended by government agencies. But I think it's still appropriate to carefully scrutizine all those that have a role and I will repeat one good reason: to ensure a more efficient/effective response, lessen the damage and keep to a minimum human suffering and death. I think we can agree that those are worthy goals.
Quite frankly I could care less if the "blame" word gets bandied about so long as there is better coordination and learning from the experience.
Some people like to make false dichotomies, that you're blaming or supporting the cuase. This is silly and misleading. One can support the cause, send money, volunteer, acknowledge what is going right AND at the same time look at what could've been done to ensure a better response. And I think that with a disaster of this scale it's vital that we do both.
I've become more aware, both from this forum and various media outlets, about the lack of preparing and poor response of Louisana state officials and I agree that this isn't just a federal problem.
Still, it would've been nice to see a more appropriate response from W.
Bill, I enjoy reading your posts (usually

) but I don't agree that laying blame, or perhaps better phrased, looking for limitations and poor past practices, hampers relief efforts. I don't agree with this logic. What hampers relief efforts is poor relief efforts and inadequate planning and coordination. If someone is bothered by negative comments about something I trust they're big enough to flip the page and ignore what they don't want to hear or believe.
"willful neglect and abication of responsibility by the US goverment" (sic)
HUH?
I find the technique of Reductio Ad Absurdum that I once taught in a logic course
I don't reduce everything so simplistically as you suggest and simply because I am angry at W for some things doesn't mean I blame him for all things, and you're stepping close to a straw man argument here.
Mark