Thankfully Mark came on board to let us know that the possibilities and the practice were there all along.Van wrote:
Nevertheless I firmly believe that if Kanei Uechi practiced, taught, and felt that the grappling component of Uechi was a critical skill to learn_ then this skill should have been demonstrated or brought to the attention of the Uechi world at large, should have been filmed just as his katas were, with guidelines to follow for learning.
As for "official Uechi Ryu", well...
- BasloDo not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise; seek what they sought.
When I think about all the great martial artists who inspired me, this is what they were about.
Kanbun learned what he learned. He was in China for a little over a decade, and then went on his own.
His son added what he wanted to the core material. He systematized a body of knowledge, fleshing out and packaging what he could. But he was just a single man.
My time with Patrick McCarthy has been very enlightening. It's fun working with someone like him on Okinawan kata bunkai. You want grappling? It's all there.
Do we practice it in our "sparring"? No. So whose fault is that? Is it the fault of the choreography where the principles of human movement are there for the taking? I think not.
"Uechi Ryu" is the packaging and commercialization of a body of knowledge. Whenever you try to pass something on, some things get lost.
To most... But not to all.
It's obvious from the comments graciously given by Mark that the Okinawans were working on their grappling skills all along. Did they have time to "package" that work into something that could be turned into a test requirement? Apparently not. Not yet, anyway...
And you know how it is with the average American. If it isn't on the test, they don't give a rat's arse. Those of us who went to undergraduate to learn were constantly annoyed by the questions of those who wanted a degree.
..... Is this going to be on the test?
..... Why are you teaching this when I won't need it for my job?

There are practical considerations as well.
Do you think Kanei's training might have been different in Futenma if the dojo had a $10K mat in the back, ready to be rolled out when they needed it?
IMO, the wooden floor is somewhat of a style Nazi for Uechi Ryu. Most don't practice certain aspects of the style for fear of injury. So "it" becomes what people can safely practice under the conditions they train in.
Meanwhile...
Gary Khoury and Mike Murphy teach in dojos where you can do a fall no problem. Both have "mat-like" floors.
The folks in Nebraska teach on a spring-loaded gymnastics routine floor. Ever wonder how those pixies can do all those dives and rolls? That floor is fabulous.
But EXPEN$IVE!!!
Many of the first generation Uechikas in this country taught where they could, when they could. It was a rented room over a restaurant, or a YMCA gymnasium, or a dance studio, or... or...
Where grappling is "what you do" (wrestling, jiujitsu, judo, aikido), you think about a mat on day 1 - or go home.
The wooden floor is a style Nazi. Today...
Excellent points - as always.Van wrote:
Ukemi is a great thing to know _ but even as taught by a good teacher that knows what he is doing, it can result in injuries even on ‘good mats’ _ to some people.
And here, the other question is whether the insurance company will cover such activities.
There's a reason I test for ukemi at the same time we test for kotekitae, ashikitae, and karadakitae. Think about this for a minute. We go to an insurance company asking for a policy.
Insurer: What do you want insurance for?
Teacher: Teaching karate
Insurer: What do you do in your classes?
Teacher: We do exercises, kata, kotekitae, and sparring.
Insurer: Uh... What's kotekitae?
Teacher: We pound on each others arms. We do that on the legs as well.
Insurer:

But really... What's all this for, anyhow? We pound arms to prevent bruises and broken bones. We teach ukemi to prevent separated shoulders, concussions, broken necks, and other assorted injuries. What's not to like about that?
I have told countless beginners' classes that the ukemi I will teach them is probably the single most useful thing they will get out of their martial arts experiences. And I have far more people coming back to me with "stories" about how they avoided a bad fall than I get stories about conquests against bad guys on the street.
Insurers should LOVE training that prevents injuries.
Ukemi is evidence-based training. It's generations old.
Insurers know that every high school kid has an opportunity to wrestle. They know they'll fall down and get thrown down in this activity. Grappling is no big deal. Grappling is part of our culture.
People get hurt. We need to accept that and get over it. What is irresponsible - IMO - is avoiding teaching things which PREVENT injuries.
What do "specialists" know that we can't figure out?????Van wrote:
So I am not against that_ but I think that for safety sake we need to ‘import’ a specialist to put the Uechi student in touch with the ‘hidden Uechi grapple’ _
FWIW... I first learned ukemi from Harry Cook - a judo teacher at UVa. He came in and gave a 1 hour seminar. I took everything he taught and made a program of it. I honed the program with years of practicing and teaching aikido.
I have no certificate which says I know ukemi. But IMO, anyone who is a Dan SHOULD know ukemi. In martial arts, it's state of the art. It's evidence-based. It's what good martial artists do. It's what any karate teacher who claims to be a teacher should know how to do.
In my humble view, it's the Uechi stragglers who should be getting the lawsuits when their students slip and fall, and hurt themselves. If they haven't at least made an effort to teach ukemki, then I call that negligence.
So with nothing more than a 1 hour class plus some experience, I have taught ukemi to over 2000 students. And I haven't had a single serious injury in any of my ukemi classes. That's data you can bring to court.
Quite the contrary, I believe I prevented many injuries.
I challenge people to show me they have students more frail than the retired who come to work out with me these days.Van wrote:
Then there are some people, who by their physical make up _ age / pre-existing conditions _cannot or will not get into falls/Ukemi/grappling applications etc.
In fact this can loose a teacher some students.
I demand people tell me their preexisting conditions. Once we know that, we work with what we have.
We come to a dojo to learn karate. If your doctor says you shouldn't be doing karate, you shouldn't be in the dojo. Meanwhile... Trying to dumb down what we do to the level of the infirmed drives away decent students and prevents us from performing an important public service.
Today I'm taking it a step farther. I am slowly developing ukemi routines that people can do on a wooden floor without a mat. Why? Because the bad guy won't care you aren't on a mat. Because people slip on sweat and fall in the dojo. (I've seen broken wrists from people who threw a front kick, missed and slipped, and stuck a hand out.) My retired boys are my lab rats. And I haven't broken any of them yet.

- Bill